Treasure
Mrs. Cohen's lecture was really terrific. I liked the addition of a hat to set the mood. One of the things I took away from the class was that maybe there is no way to ensure Jewish continuity. Seventy percent is a large number, but when you look at each of her children individually, whether they had Jewish babies is pretty random. It looks like a combination of personal inclination and circumstance. Treasure Cohen's mother had the type of personality that embraced Judaism and she happened to meet and marry someone who wanted to raise a Jewish family with her. Of course, parenting must contribute something to how a child turns out, so it's not surprising that many of the younger children did not end up having Jewish children. I was surprised, however, that none of the children of the inter-married couples, even when the mother was Jewish, considered themselves Jewish. I think the time that her children were coming of age was a particularly hard one to maintain a Jewish identity in. It's hard to pay temple dues when there's a depression. Coupled with the xenophobia and political movements of the day that weren't Judaism-friendly, a lot of Jews probably renounced their religion.
It was also really interesting to see how different the observance of a Conservative Jew was then compared to the average observance level of a Conservative Jew today.
1 Comments:
i think mrs. cohen's general point was that it really wasn't circumstance, in that the children who grewup following the unfortunate passing of the mother had a much harder time finding continuity in Judaism, and finding the importance of Judaism in their everyday lives.
The sheer presence of a role model who holds his or her Judaism so dear to their heart definitely contributes to the continuity of Judaism in future generations. With the absence of that the younger children didn't have that continuity, which may be why the numbers of descendants who identified jewishly were so low.
Post a Comment
<< Home